Zero-Day & Emerging Threat Response
Adapt defenses before attackers adapt their exploits.
Why You Should Care
- Zero-days trigger panic and manual triage across teams
- Exposure impact is unclear and varies by environment
- Security teams waste hours determining relevance and reachability
- Controls are rarely tuned until after alerts, scans, or exploitation
- Average time to exploit a Zero-day has gone from “5-days in 2024 to -1-days in 2025” - Google M-Trends 2025 Report.
How Tuskira Solves It
Tuskira treats zero-days as a defense optimization problem, not an alerting problem. As new vulnerabilities or exploit techniques emerge, AI agents immediately evaluate real-world impact using the Digital Twin.
- Impact Validation: The Digital Twin tests whether the vulnerability can actually be reached in your environment, accounting for network paths, identities, and existing controls.
- Defense Optimization: AI agents evaluate control coverage across EDR, WAF, IAM, firewall, and detection layers to identify gaps and overexposure, before attackers exploit them.
- Preemptive Hardening: Tuskira recommends validated remediations such as code fixes, configuration changes, and security control updates, to the right owners before alerts, scans, or exploitation occur.
Who benefits
- Security Engineering teams evaluating control effectiveness under new threats
- Detection Engineering teams tuning detections based on real exposure, not headlines
- Incident Response leads who need fast impact clarity without panic
Stop reacting. Start preempting.
Book a Demo to see how AI Analysts validate threats, close attack paths, and keep you ahead of risk.
Tuskira’s Difference
Watch the video
Learn how Tuskira transforms noisy SOCs into autonomous, AI-driven defense systems that validate, simulate, and preempt threats.
