Close the loop on risk.
Before and during the attack.

A fleet of AI agents on the stack you already own. Test from the outside like an attacker, reduce exposure before the attack, investigate and respond during it, and feed every outcome back into your defenses.

Red Team AgentOutside-in attack simulation
External Asset DiscoveryWhat an attacker can reach
before the attack
Reduce exposure
Undefended CVEsHunting zero daysDiscover breach paths
during the attack
Investigate & respond
FP eliminationCampaign detectionIncident response
Security Data Fabric
Digital
Twin
live model of the enterprise
Agentic defense loopPrioritize · Investigate · Respond · Verify
Sovereign DataSovereign AI
Threat FeedsMythos, CTI
MCP GatewayAgent-safe tool access
Runtime ScannersTenableQualysRapid7WizCrowdStrikeMicrosoft DefenderAWS InspectorPrisma Cloud
Code & CI/CD ScannersGitHubGitLabVeracodeCheckmarxInvictiBurp SuiteNullifyBitbucket
Compensating ControlsCrowdStrike FalconSentinelOneMicrosoft DefenderCloudflare WAFHalcyonCisco MerakiMicrosoft Entra IDFalco
SIEM & Log SourcesMicrosoft SentinelSplunkGoogle MandiantServiceNowJiraAWS Security HubSlackCisco Duo
Third-party tools and controlstelemetry inverdicts and actions out

The agentic defense loop: before and during the attack

Feeding the loop
Red Team Agent · VectorExternal Asset DiscoveryThreat Feeds · Mythos, CTIMCP Gateway
Before the attack

Reduce exposure

Find undefended CVEs, hunt zero days, and map breach paths against the defenses you already own.

Undefended CVEsHunting zero daysBreach paths
The engine

Agentic defense loop

Agents reason over the digital twin the Security Data Fabric keeps current, then prioritize, investigate, respond, and verify, learning from every cycle.

PrioritizeInvestigateRespondVerify
During the attack

Investigate & respond

Eliminate false positives, correlate campaigns, and drive incident response with agents that never queue.

FP eliminationCampaign detectionIncident response
Customer Impact

One loop. Three measurable outcomes.

Respond
Days of fire drill
15 min
Zero-day assessment
From CVE announcement to confirmed reach and the compensating control that closes it first.
Verdicts
3 weeks
30 min
Triage time
From signal to verdict, with human approval where it counts.
Context
12.3M findings
0.46%
Actionable risk
The slice that is actually exploitable and reachable. The rest is noise.
Findings reduction and 30-minute triage from one global financial-services deployment.
Why Tuskira

Your controls will keep multiplying. Rules can't orchestrate them.

Nobody is shrinking the stack. The question is who runs it.

01
A live digital twin of your environment

Assets, identities, exposures, controls, and detections in one live model, kept current by the Security Data Fabric as your environment changes. Logs stay where they live.

02
Agents that reason

Agents build the investigation on first encounter, and each one has allowed tools, evidence requirements, and an approval gate.

03
Paths tested against your controls

Kairo tests whether a path is reachable, whether your controls break it, and whether the fix closed it. Same CVE, two systems, two answers.

04
One model for exposure and investigation

What is breachable before an incident and what an incident can touch come from the same model, across your whole stack.

The engine · Security Data Fabric

One security model over the stack you already own.

Exposure asks what is breachable. Investigation asks what this incident can touch. Both answers come from the same live model, across cloud, identity, endpoint, network, on-prem, and the SIEM.

AGENTIC WORKFORCEVectorKairoLatticeQuellIrisSecurity Data Fabricnormalizes every signal into your live digital twinAssets · Identities · Exposures · Controls · Attack Paths · Episode MemoryQUERIED IN PLACE · 150+ TOOLS · DATA STAYS PUTIdentityEndpointCloudNetworkSIEMEmail · Threat Intel

The digital twin continuously models how identities, assets, controls, and exposures interact, so agents can reason about reachability before an attacker does.

Before and during the attack · the agents

Five agents. One continuous loop.

With the mesh in place, here is what runs on top of it. Vector tests from the outside; the rest reason over what it finds. Adopt any agent on its own, or run them together as one continuous loop. Each reasons over the same context, so the more you connect, the smarter every agent gets.

VECTOR

Autonomous Red Team & Exposure Validation

Probes your approved external scope the way an attacker would, using new TTPs, fresh CVEs, and AI-driven techniques. Every finding is checked against the controls you have deployed, the risks your tools already report, and your application and infrastructure topology, so you act only on what an attacker could use.

"Can they get in?"
KAIRO

Breach Path Detection & Disruption

Models how exposures, identities, workloads, and controls chain into real cross-domain attack paths. Tests whether your deployed controls actually break the path, stages the compensating fix through tools you already own, then re-tests the path to prove it is closed. Same CVE, two systems, two different answers.

"Where can they go?"
LATTICE

Exposure & Vulnerability Prioritization

Validates exploitable risk across VM, cloud, identity, AppSec, and business context. Reduces millions of findings to the small subset that is exploitable, reachable, and undefended, so teams focus on breachable issues, not raw severity.

"What matters most?"
QUELL

Zero-Day & Emerging Threat Response

When a new CVE drops, Quell answers whether it creates a reachable path in your environment, then recommends the compensating control that closes it first. Exposure validation at the speed threats now move.

"Does this new threat create a path?"
IRIS

Alert Triage & Investigation

A two-stage investigation. Stage one returns a true or false positive verdict with confidence. Confirmed positives escalate to stage two, which builds a MITRE-mapped attack timeline, blast-radius analysis, and tiered response recommendations.

"What happened, and what should we do?"
During the attack · how an investigation runs

What's automated, and what stays human.

Works on day one. Open any row to see the mechanics.

Layer 0Query where the data lives GAFederated search across 150+ tools, no centralization.
A two-tier correlation model turns scattered tool results into one view without moving your data.
  • Tier-1 signals stay where they are generated (an EDR alert, an NDR anomaly, an identity risk event, a cloud audit signal). Your existing tools keep doing the detecting.
  • Tier-2 federated queries sweep recent Tier-1 findings across sources, joined by entity and time window, and escalate when signals converge.
  • One question is answered by querying every relevant source at once, so coverage holds when a source is quiet or incomplete.
Layer 1Every alert to a verdict GATrue or false positive, with confidence, automatically.
A normalized alert from Splunk, Sentinel, or a native Tuskira detection runs through three phases:
  • Prepare: extract the triggering event, enrich entities, and check the Security Data Fabric for entity baselines, detection-rule priors, and cached IoC verdicts.
  • Assess: answer a merged set of your dynamic playbook questions plus OCSF-framework questions, accumulating weighted true and false positive signals.
  • Verdict: compute scores and render a true or false positive with high, medium, or low confidence, then either close it or escalate to Layer 2.
Layer 2Full attack timeline and blast radius GAMITRE-mapped investigation reasoning, end to end.
Layer 2 inherits the full triage context, then runs Tuskira's proprietary MITRE-mapped investigation reasoning (PEAK-ABLE):
  • PEAK (Prepare, Execute, Act) decomposes hypotheses, runs the evidence-gathering queries, then renders verdict and recommendations.
  • ABLE (Actor, Behavior, Location, Evidence) maps each hypothesis to MITRE ATT&CK techniques and the exact data sources where evidence should appear.
  • Blast radius: other users from the same source IP, other targets by the same actor, other hosts with the same file hash, correlated across 1h / 24h / 7d windows.
  • Output: a MITRE-mapped timeline and tiered recommendations (0-1h, 1-24h, 1-7d, 7-30d), plus the detection gaps it found.
Verdict-Driven

Analysts get decisions, not another queue.

Most AI copilots hand you a summary. Tuskira hands you the decision and the receipts. Every investigation ends in a structured, schema-validated report your case management can consume directly, carrying the evidence ledger, cumulative scores, a confidence band, and the full reasoning trace. A senior analyst can resume any case in the Analyst Copilot, pivot the agent, query live tools, and challenge the call.

Investigation ReportTRUE POSITIVE · CRITICAL
TechniqueT1078 · Valid Accounts
EntryCompromised identity → RDS
Blast radius3 hosts · 1 data store
Recommended (0-1h)Revoke tokens · isolate host
CONFIDENCE
EVIDENCE LEDGER
+ Impossible-travel sign-in+ Token replay from new ASN+ RDS access off-baseline– No prior MFA failures
What happens when the AI is wrong?

The question every CISO is asking about agentic security. Tuskira's answer is built into the architecture, not left to a setting.

Investigation
Fully autonomous
Triage, timelines, blast radius, and recommendations run end to end with zero human intervention.
Containment
Requires human approval
Disable, isolate, block, or revoke. The agent prepares the action, an analyst approves it. Always.
No agent-initiated destructive actions. Human-in-the-loop is architectural, not a toggle.
What the model does, and what it never decides.
The model does
  • Forms competing hypotheses and disproves the alternatives before it commits
  • Chooses which evidence to pull and records every query
  • Builds the investigation and playbook on first encounter, then writes the explanation a human reads
The model never decides
  • What is reachable. The graph and the Kairo path model do.
  • What it may execute. Policy does, through your own controls.
  • Where your logs live. They stay in place.
Every cycle · the loop learns

Built on memory, not prompts.

The outcome, the playbook, and the evidence are written back to the Security Data Fabric, so the next cycle starts from a better model than the last one.

MITRE-mapped investigation reasoning

A proprietary hypothesis-decomposition method (PEAK-ABLE) that maps every investigation step deterministically to MITRE ATT&CK, not a generic chain-of-thought.

Per-tenant Security Data Fabric

Every investigation feeds entities, outcomes, and prior probabilities back into your own twin. Future investigations check it first, improving consistency and cutting cost.

Defense optimization

Tuskira evaluates your existing controls, identifies which risks are defensible, and recommends precise changes to collapse validated breach paths through tools you already own.

Analyst Copilot per case

Resume any agent session with the full transcript and live tool access. Tuskira treats the analyst as a peer of the agent, not a rubber stamp.

Built For Trust & Control

Transparent by design, auditable by default.

Sovereign data

Your telemetry stays in your boundary, always. Tuskira queries scanners, controls, logs, and SIEM in place and never copies them into a new lake.

Auditable AI

Every prompt, tool call, evidence artifact, and verdict is logged per tenant and reviewable without Tuskira in the room. Containment always waits for a human.

Per-action transparency

The exact prompt, every tool call, every evidence artifact, and every model response, captured per case for analysts and machines alike.

Per-tenant isolation

Isolated credentials, case store, and audit log per tenant. Built for MSSPs and regulated industries from the ground up.

Independent audit

Customers can audit their own tenant traffic without Tuskira operator involvement. Every action is attributable and timestamped.

See your stack reason at machine speed.

Bring your own tools. Keep your data in place. Watch Tuskira turn scattered signals into verdicts.

Get a Demo